Vice President JD Vance drew widespread criticism on social media Tuesday after delivering what observers described as an awkward attempt at humor during his keynote speech at the Ohio Republican Party dinner in Lima, Ohio.
While addressing the audience about the challenges of political life, Vance made a gesture that immediately sparked online mockery. During his remarks about taking the rough with the smooth in politics, he referenced interactions in Washington, D.C.
The Vice President told the audience he knows it’s not always easy to be a political candidate, then proceeded to make his controversial gesture. He indicated that in Washington, D.C., there’s a particular sign that he believes means “We’re No. 1 in Washington, D.C.” At this point, Vance flipped his middle finger and held it in place while continuing his remarks.
Vance continued his commentary while maintaining the gesture, suggesting that “all the pink-haired people throw up this sign” and questioning whether it means “We’re No. 1.” He then said, “I choose to take that as that symbol in Washington.”
The line drew some laughter from the audience at the Republican Party event. However, the reception on social media platforms was significantly less favorable, with critics describing the gesture as cringeworthy and questioning the Vice President’s comedic timing.
Social media users were quick to mock the Vice President’s attempt at humor. One critic suggested the gesture was an attempt to match President Donald Trump’s earlier use of profanity during remarks about Israel and Iran’s ceasefire situation. Another user expressed confusion about the joke itself, while others criticized what they perceived as forced attempts at appearing relatable.
The incident occurred on the same day that President Trump had dropped an F-bomb while discussing the Israel-Iran ceasefire situation, leading some observers to suggest Vance was attempting to match the President’s provocative rhetoric. Critics characterized the Vice President’s gesture as an example of trying too hard to appear edgy or populist.
Several social media commentators noted what they perceived as a lack of authenticity in Vance’s delivery. Some described his attempt at humor as having “negative charisma,” while others suggested he should focus on different approaches to public speaking. The criticism extended beyond the gesture itself to broader questions about Vance’s public persona and communication style.
The Tuesday evening event in Lima marked another instance where Vance’s public appearances have generated attention for reasons beyond his policy positions. The Vice President has previously faced scrutiny for various public moments, including recent international diplomatic encounters and other speaking engagements.
Critics on social media platforms drew comparisons between current and previous administrations’ approaches to public discourse. Some users noted the contrast with past reactions to less provocative language from previous political figures, suggesting a double standard in public expectations for political rhetoric.
The incident adds to a series of public moments that have drawn mixed reactions to the Vice President’s communication style. Observers noted that while the gesture drew some positive response from the immediate audience, the broader public reaction through social media channels was predominantly negative.
Video footage of the moment was quickly shared across social media platforms, with users offering various interpretations of the Vice President’s intent and execution. The widespread sharing of the clip contributed to the rapid spread of criticism and commentary about the incident.
The speech was part of Vance’s ongoing engagement with Republican Party organizations across the country. The Lima dinner represented one of several such events where the Vice President has served as a keynote speaker since taking office.
Political observers noted that the incident reflects broader challenges facing political figures in balancing formal diplomatic roles with efforts to maintain a connection with their political base supporters. The reception of Vance’s gesture highlighted the difficulties in translating campaign-style rhetoric to official governmental positions.
The Vice President’s office has not issued any statement regarding the incident or the subsequent social media reaction. The gesture continues to generate discussion about appropriate conduct for high-ranking government officials at political events.